Picture this: You've poured your soul into crafting a cinematic masterpiece, only to unleash it into the world and face a whirlwind of polarized opinions that leave you questioning everything. It's a gut-wrenching experience that many filmmakers dread, but what if there was a way to find peace amidst the chaos? Director Ari Aster has discovered just that, drawing unexpected comfort from the divisive backlash to his recent works, Beau Is Afraid and Eddington, by immersing himself in a documentary about one of cinema's most iconic figures. But here's where it gets controversial—could embracing audience alienation actually be the key to true artistic freedom? Let's dive in and explore how this revelation unfolded.
Movie News
Posted 55 minutes ago
The forthcoming comprehensive documentary, Mr. Scorsese, offers a profound look into the life and illustrious career of legendary director Martin Scorsese. Our own Alex Maidy, in his glowing review (available at https://www.joblo.com/mr-scorsese-tv-review-an-extensive-deep-dive-into-the-career-and-impact-of-the-filmmaker-on-cinematic-history/), describes it as utterly captivating. He notes that, spanning five hours, the film pays respectful homage to Scorsese while candidly addressing his personal struggles and career setbacks. By featuring anecdotes from collaborators who worked alongside him through different stages of his journey, it provides an unparalleled glimpse into his growth as a creative visionary. Scorsese himself holds nothing back, openly discussing his errors and standing firm on his bold choices in filmmaking. As Maidy puts it, 'Mr. Scorsese stands out as one of the most compelling profiles of a director I've ever encountered.'
And this is the part most people miss—it's not just a tribute; it's a raw, honest exploration that resonates deeply with those in the industry. For instance, beginners in filmmaking might not realize how rare it is for a documentary to balance admiration with unflinching critique, making it easier to understand why Scorsese's story feels so relatable.
One individual profoundly moved by this documentary is filmmaker Ari Aster. According to Deadline (https://deadline.com/2025/10/ari-aster-on-watching-mr-scorsese-at-new-york-film-festival-1236570763/), Aster shared his insights during a roundtable at the New York Film Festival, revealing how watching it brought him a sense of reassurance. Specifically, it aided him in navigating the heated debates surrounding his latest projects, Beau Is Afraid (check out the reactions at https://www.joblo.com/ari-aster-beau-is-afraid-reaction/) and Eddington. Aster elaborated,
'As someone who's directed a few movies that sparked intense division, it's reassuring to recall that even The King of Comedy didn't land well with everyone. Seriously, The Age of Innocence fell short of expectations? And New York, New York—to me, it's an exhilarating, playful, innovative gem that's far more precious than some flawless bauble.'
Sponsored Content
Aster observes that his initial films, Hereditary and Midsommar, garnered more positive feedback than his subsequent ones, Beau Is Afraid and Eddington. 'Yet, I have to admit, I wasn't entirely thrilled with the buzz around the first pair either. Now, I'm even less fond of how the later ones have been received. But tuning into this documentary yesterday felt incredibly calming,' he shared. He went on to explain, 'Releasing a movie is emotionally shattering. Even when it succeeds, it slips from your grasp, and the public's interpretations can feel unrecognizable—it's isolating and strange. And when the feedback doesn't match your hopes, it's downright crushing.'
To put this in perspective for newcomers, think of it like sharing a deeply personal story with friends; if they twist it into something you didn't intend, it can feel like a betrayal of your vision. Aster drew a powerful lesson from Scorsese's path: 'Many of his works were like electrifying flashes of genius... particularly those unafraid to push audiences away. The focus is always on what the film demands, without any contrived calculations. That's the wisdom that shaped me as I grew, and it's what I revisit to remind myself: yes, that's the way.'
Now, here's the controversial twist—Aster's embrace of films that alienate viewers challenges the mainstream notion that box office success equals artistic triumph. Is it possible that some of the most groundbreaking movies are the ones that divide opinions, forcing audiences to confront uncomfortable truths? For example, Scorsese's Taxi Driver or The Last Temptation of Christ sparked outrage but are now hailed as classics. Does this mean filmmakers should prioritize authenticity over popularity, even if it means fewer fans? It's a debate worth pondering.
What do you think? Do you agree that alienating audiences can lead to more meaningful art, or is there value in striving for broader appeal? Share your thoughts in the comments below—do you side with Aster's perspective, or do you see it differently? Let's keep the conversation going!
About the Author
News Editor
Favorite Movies: Action flicks from the 80s and 90s, Bruce Lee classics, Jackie Chan adventures, Die Hard, the Back to the Future series, Jurassic Park, Rocky IV, Speed, Terminator 1 & 2, and plenty more!
Likes: Cinema, acting, writing, Photoshop, video editing, the golden eras of The Simpsons, Conan O'Brien, Bill Burr, diving into YouTube spirals, french fries and Pepsi, and creating art on my page at https://www.deviantart.com/ejtangonan
